Comments on: Religious Neutrality (repost) http://www.leftist.org/haightspeech/archives/7.html Kyle and Anne Haight: Annoying People In Stereo Since 1971 Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:56:39 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Percy Jane http://www.leftist.org/haightspeech/archives/7.html/comment-page-1#comment-13 Percy Jane Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:23:14 +0000 http://www2.leftist.org/haightspeech/?p=7#comment-13 I love your site. It´s really a pleasure to read through all this interesting stuff and it home. I love your site. It´s really a pleasure to read through all this interesting stuff and it home.

]]> By: Aaron Priven http://www.leftist.org/haightspeech/archives/7.html/comment-page-1#comment-12 Aaron Priven Tue, 09 Sep 2003 05:23:43 +0000 http://www2.leftist.org/haightspeech/?p=7#comment-12 Congress is not prohibited from establishing a secular philosophy as a state philosophy, but it is prohibited from establishing a religion as a state religion. It may or may not be that subsidizing a religious message in this way amounts to the "establishment" of a religion, but clearly there is a distinction here between secular and non-secular messages. I have no idea why I'm writing this. Hi Anne and Kyle! Congress is not prohibited from establishing a secular philosophy as a state philosophy, but it is prohibited from establishing a religion as a state religion. It may or may not be that subsidizing a religious message in this way amounts to the “establishment” of a religion, but clearly there is a distinction here between secular and non-secular messages.

I have no idea why I’m writing this. Hi Anne and Kyle!

]]>